On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, My BSD wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:06:26 -0800 (PST) > Davide Libenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... <snip> ... > > > > I thought I explained pretty clearly the behavior, by citing even the RFC. > > MTA -> MTA transaction does not fit the bill of "message has left the SMTP > > environment" in my books. MTA -> Mailbox does, and that when XMail does > > actually something WRT Return-Path. > > > ... <snip> ... > > Thank you for your reply Davide. > > You did explain it clearly but you are not following your own reasoning. > > Perhaps I did not ask my question clearly enough. To ask it again, succintly: > > At the end of the SMTP session, why, when the message already contains a > Return-Path header, does XMail not prepend a Return-Path header (and strip > any existing header) upon final delivery to a Maildir or MBox, ?
Ok, I see it. That was done in order to preserve the Return-Path: for PSYNC messages. But it needs different handling for SMTP. I'll look into it. - Davide _______________________________________________ xmail mailing list [email protected] http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
