> The compiler could write the new value resulting from the "=" back to
> "which" and then write back the value of the ++. This would leave "which"
> with a value which was not intended.
It could ? I thought the semanticcs of X = Y were that the entirity of Y
was evaluated and completed before the assignment was made to X ? Well,
you learn something new every day I guess.
Anyway, have you tried going through and correcting these to see if
it works ? Would be iinteresting...
-bat.
_______________________________________________
Xmame mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
