Anyone brave enough to try gcc 3.0? Personally, I'd much rather wait for 3.01 or 3.1 or whatever... It would be interesting to know whether it fixes any of the problems people have noticed with -O2 and whatnot. Bryan _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
- Re: [Xmame] gcc 3.0? Bryan J. Cassidy
- Re: [Xmame] gcc 3.0? Joe Ceklosky
- Re: [Xmame] gcc 3.0? Christopher Stone
- Re: [Xmame] gcc 3.0? Joe Ceklosky
- Re: [Xmame] gcc 3.0? Christopher Stone
- Re: [Xmame] gcc 3.0? Joe Ceklosky
- Re: [Xmame] gcc 3.0? Lawrence Gold
