I doubt very many people would have the "unglitched" ROM. So I'd
keep it in sync with MAME by default, but #ifdef out the alternate source,
and document that in the changelog for people who want to
compile it themselves.
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:40:10AM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 3 May 2002 09:28:08 -0600
> Lawrence Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > P.S. xmame-0.60.1 is under way. I'll try to have it out in a few days.
>
> Should the source code fix to use the new, "un-glitched" gtmr2 romset be included?
>It's not the same gtmr2 romseet that's currently in the "official" Mame 0.60, but it
>will probably be included in 0.61.
>
> The romset is available now and it (apparently) works properly, unlike the
>"official" 0.60 gtmr2 romset which has graphic glitches.
>
> The only downside is that using this romset would put the xmame 0.60 romsets
>out-of-sync with the romsets for "regular" Mame 0.60.
>
> I have it here, so we could include the newer version in the xmame 0.60 romset
>update tarball (when it's ready, and yes Lawrence, we need xmame 0.60.1 first so we
>can test our rom updates for completness and so on).
>
> What it comes down to is, do we want to have a working gtmr2 romset included in
>xmame 0.60.1 or do we want to stick with the romset that's currently used by Mame
>0.60?
>
> I'm in favour of including the working "proper" romset, myself. I have the
>necessary source code changes here too, by the way.
>
> What's everyone else's preference?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xmame mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
--
Steve 'Nephtes' Freeland | A terrible, guilty secret
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Hidden in plain sight
_______________________________________________
Xmame mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
