Caleb Shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :

> I found that the asm cores still build fine.  Are you trying to do a
> parallel make (-j2)?  I've found that this breaks the xmame build.

Not at all, I'm building it as I always built it :-(
Furthermore, without X86_ASM_68000=1 it builds fine for me now.

For Red Hat 8.x users, I've put up my packages here (no xgl as the build
fails) :
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/testing/xmame/

Matthias

> On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 10:52, Lawrence Gold wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 01:04:06PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> > > 
> > > make DISPLAY_METHOD=x11 X11_DGA=1 X11_XV=1
> > > [...]
> > > Compiling src/cpu/jaguar/jaguar.c ...
> > > Compiling src/cpu/konami/konami.c ...
> > > Compiling src/cpu/m6502/m6502.c ...
> > > Compiling src/cpu/m6800/m6800.c ...
> > > make: *** No rule to make target `src/cpu/m68000/make68k.c', needed
> > > by`xmame.obj/cpu/m68000/68000.asm'.  Stop.
> > > 
> > > Looks like a Makefile problem somewhere. I'm using the same options
> > > in my(patched) makefile as I always do.
> > 
> > I remember hearing something about removing support for the asm 68k
> > core, since it can't be placed under (L)GPL if the mamedevs decide to
> > change the license.
> > 
> > This may have nothing to do with it, though.  I'll see what I can find 
> > this evening.

-- 
Matthias Saou                                World Trade Center
-------------                                Edificio Norte 4 Planta
System and Network Engineer                  08039 Barcelona, Spain
Electronic Group Interactive                 Phone : +34 936 00 23 23

_______________________________________________
Xmame mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame

Reply via email to