Sorry about that, I could have provided a more useful link to where the conversation started: http://irclog.perlgeek.de/mojo/2014-11-27#i_9730172
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Chase Whitener <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think Mojo::JSON handled the booleans about as well as can be expected > with Perl. > > examples: > > perl -Mojo -E 'my $true_scalar = "1"; my $false_scalar = "0"; say j([1, > "1", \1, Mojo::JSON->true, \$true_scalar, 0, "0", \0, Mojo::JSON->false, > \$false_scalar])' > > perl -Mojo -E 'say j([1, \1, Mojo::JSON->true])' > > IRC conversation about it: > http://irclog.perlgeek.de/mojo/2014-11-27 > > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Mark Overmeer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> * Patrick Powell ([email protected]) [141216 15:34]: >> > Ummm... and look at JSON and 'true' and 'false'. >> >> Correct. In Apache::Solr, I ended up building tables of fields and which >> are boolean, to automatically translate Perl's concept of booleans into >> Solr's URI parameters. >> >> IMO Perl libraries should attempt to hide the typedness of interfaces... >> JSON itself is on a too basic level to do it itself. But interfaces >> which transport their data via JSON could (should?) try to automate the >> required conversions... often quite some work. >> -- >> Regards, >> >> MarkOv >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Mark Overmeer MSc MARKOV Solutions >> [email protected] [email protected] >> http://Mark.Overmeer.net http://solutions.overmeer.net >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xml-compile mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xml-compile >> >
_______________________________________________ Xml-compile mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xml-compile
