Christian Junk wrote:
So, is there anyone out there who still works on XBEL or is willing to restart
the work on it? Do you think there actually is a need to extend and/or
enhance XBEL 1.0?
I think this list should still work as a discussion place for XBEL. The
important point of XBEL is still *exchange*, so I think we should follow
a careful process, working towards XBEL 1.2.
One such process could be:
- collect issues with the current XBEL DTD.
- propose modifications for XBEL (*not* calling it XBEL 1.2 at that
time)
- contact XBEL implementors about such proposed changes, and their
opinion about it.
I have just added an XBEL tracker at
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=707658&group_id=6473&func=browse
where people should collect issues about XBEL they find.
Depending on the feedback we get, we can then setup a schedule for
releasing new revisions of XBEL.
Regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
XML-SIG maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sig
