Paul Moore wrote: >> Amara is based on cDomlette, right? if so, you'll find benchmark >> figures here: >> >> http://effbot.org/zone/celementtree.htm#benchmarks > > Thanks, I hadn't realised that.
I was wrong. same benchmark as above, on slightly slower hardware. amara 0.9.2 bind_file: 8.85 seconds (~20000k) amara 0.9.2 pushdom: 5.62 seconds (~12000k) amara 0.9.2 pushbind: 160.5 seconds (~6500k) cdomlette: 0.66 seconds (~20000k) celementtree parse: 0.06 seconds (4900k) celementtree iterparse: 0.12 seconds (~200k) </F> _______________________________________________ XML-SIG maillist - XML-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sig