Paul Moore wrote:

>> Amara is based on cDomlette, right?  if so, you'll find benchmark
>> figures here:
>>
>>     http://effbot.org/zone/celementtree.htm#benchmarks
>
> Thanks, I hadn't realised that.

I was wrong.

same benchmark as above, on slightly slower hardware.

    amara 0.9.2 bind_file: 8.85 seconds (~20000k)
    amara 0.9.2 pushdom: 5.62 seconds (~12000k)
    amara 0.9.2 pushbind: 160.5 seconds (~6500k)

    cdomlette: 0.66 seconds (~20000k)

    celementtree parse: 0.06 seconds (4900k)
    celementtree iterparse: 0.12 seconds (~200k)

</F> 



_______________________________________________
XML-SIG maillist  -  XML-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sig

Reply via email to