Am Freitag, 28. Januar 2005 17:26 schrieb Uche Ogbuji: > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:57 +0100, Christian Junk wrote: > > Am Freitag, 28. Januar 2005 16:46 schrieb Uche Ogbuji: > > > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:44 +0100, Christian Junk wrote: > > > > Perhaps we should think of using XML Scheme instead of DTD? > > > > > > RELAX NG, please. > > > > So, don't you like XML Scheme? > > No. I don't like W3C XML Schema. I think it's far too quirky and > complex. > > But no need for schema language wars. We can start with one language > and use tools such as trang to generate others. I do think that RELAX > NG has the most expressive power (except for Schematron), so I still > think it's the best starting place.
You're right! If it is required we can still translate a RNC syntax definition to a XML scheme, automatically ;) But whatever scheme language we use, you all agree that DTD is no alternative for the future of XBEL? -- Christian Junk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FH Trier, University of Applied Sciences Faculty of Design and Applied Computer Science http://christianjunk.webinternals.de http://xbel.webinternals.de _______________________________________________ XML-SIG maillist - XML-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sig
