Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2007-08-11 10:37:36 AM:
> PyXML hasn't been actively maintained since the last release a few years
ago,
> so you'd be very lucky if someone comes up with a new release that fixes
this.
Thanks for the warning.
> If you need that feature, feel free to check if lxml handles this
asexpected.
> It's based on libxml2, so it should follow the standard. It's also much
easier
> to use than PyXML.
>
> http://codespeak.net/lxml/
I am now switching to lxml and besides the fact that it is maintained,
there is another advantage for me: lxml reports all validation problems in
an error log, while PyXML would only report the first validation problem by
raising an exception.
Thanks!
Bye,
Maarten_______________________________________________
XML-SIG maillist - XML-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sig
