On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 03:58:50PM -0500, Joel Reed wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:04:41PM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > snip > > > I think defaulting to file descriptor based low level access and avoiding > > FILE pointer as much as possible would be a general nice enhancement where > > needed, I remember something with some verions of UNIX having ridiculously > > low number of simultaneous FILE opened for a given process. > > i agree but am wondering how this would fit with no-(api/api) changes > policy... all new APIs using file descriptors?
no but making sure when we provide a path to a file that all I/O are done through fds not FILEs. > also, while on topic of APIs, the fact that extension registeration > functions don't take the hash to register the extension in as an > argument, but instead register to global xmlHashes means folks wanting > to using plugins MUST dynamically link libxslt into the plugin. > would we ever want to fix that? not sure... I'm not sure I understand :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
