It probably does not go far enough. The risk of not providing support / licensing is that the software will become unused. However, if the remainder of the community supports the effort, this is unlikely to happen.
What would be nice to see is a revokation of not only support, but licensing as well. Deny them access to the best tools. Even if they decided to generate their own tools, they are not likely to be of the same quality, and I think they would realize that it would be better to get along than go it alone. David Bauer Ph.D Candidate, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Computer Science Department Office: Amos Eaton 205 Phone : (518) 276 2657 URI : http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~bauerd On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Rick Jones wrote: > http://veillard.com/nohelp.html > > rick jones > http://www.netperf.org/ > _______________________________________________ > xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml > _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
