On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:43:12AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote: > >># diff -c xmlmodule.c.orig xmlmodule.c > > > > > > okay, makes sense. I made the changes, thanks ! > > BTW patches are better sent as mail attachments so they don't > >get messed up by the transport layers. > > (BTW, I changed my subcription to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from > [EMAIL PROTECTED], so the approval stuff should no longer be an issue - > noticed it when I saw the delays.) > > Inline vs attachements - every project seems to go differently there :( > Some lists strip attachments, hard to keep it striaght which is which. All > thanks to that OS that can't seem to ever shake a cold (virus)... sigh. > I'll try to remember to do attachments in the future.
okidoc, thanks ! > So, with those patches I get clean compiles for both 32 and 64-bit 11.11 > and 11.23 IPF. I can though generate beaucoup warnings if I enable all > warnings and migration (32 to 64-bit) warnings. The bulk of them seem > harmless (having waded through them briefly) and some look like the > compiler being overly paranoid, but some may be of interest. Would you > like to see the entire list (as an attachment of course :)? there was a guy from cea.fr who was posting all warning obtained by compiling on Solaris or HP-UX in bugzilla, good to have them there and try to cleanup between releases, so yes sure ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
