On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:19:30AM -0800, Aleksey Sanin wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:13:53AM -0800, Aleksey Sanin wrote: > > > >>>Indeed. however, I found > >>>http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ietf-uri/rev-2002/issues.html?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html#014-empty-opaque_part > >>> > >>>so it will be allowed in the future. Any chance of getting this specific > >>>bit in before the new rfc gets published? > >> > >>I don't have any problem with it. Daniel? > > > > > > It's a bit more general than just WebDAV, see my other post about 3986, > > > Yes, I've seen it. But I can hard code "DAV:" exception in c14n for now. > It's ugly but I am not sure there is other workaround for Martijn.
it's ugly, but it's your module, so :-) At least keep a note about the future uri.c revision around the hack... Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
