Le mardi 19 avril 2005 Ã 13:32 +0200, Kasimier Buchcik a Ãcrit :
> On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 13:07 +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 20:51 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > I'm trying to validate the following document:
> > > 
> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > > <wsdl:definitions xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";>
> > >   <wsdl:types>
> > >   </wsdl:types>
> > > </wsdl:definitions>
> > > 
> > > against the wsdl schema (found at the expected url)
> > > 
> > > Somehow xmllint outputs this crazy validation error. It's so gross I
> > > fear I'm missing something obvious (verified on FC Devel & windows)
> > 
> > It's a bug and related to bug [1]. 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > The schema processor still has an issue with <any> wildcards with a
> > namespace value of "##other". 
> > I tried a workaround for the problem described in [1] but it's
> > apparently not working.
> > 
> > The instance is accepted if the workaround is removed; unfortunately
> > an instance like the following would be then accepted as well:
> > 
> > <wsdl:definitions xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";>
> >     <wsdl:fds/>
> > </wsdl:definitions>
> > 
> > I.e. we are currently not able to restrict the namespaces to "##other".
> > 
> > I will remove the workaround if there are no objections, since it seems
> > to do more harm than good.
> 
> [...]
> 
> OK, workaround removed in xmlschemas.c rev. 1.131.
> But with the current state, the schema processor will be quite useless
> in conjunction with the <any> wildcard: since it's "unbounded" it will
> let pass _any_ element node.
> 
> We certainly need help from the automaton module here to solve this.

Thanks - not being able to use xmllint to validate core soap schemas was
slightly annoying.

Any ETA on when it'll hit a release ?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Reply via email to