Re: [xml] redicting parts of trees

[Rob Richards]

Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
On the other side, if the missing declaration xmlns:b="urn:test:foo" was
stored internally _somewhere_ instead, we would get:
 - adopt some nodes with:
     @node == <foo><b:bar/><foo/>, with b bound to "urn:test:foo"
 - for every @node we will get:
     <foo><b:bar/><foo/>
     and a xmlns:b="urn:test:foo" stored internally on the document
 - if added to the destination tree it could look like this.
   <dest xmlns:b="urn:test:foo">
     <foo><b:bar/><foo/>
     <foo><b:bar/><foo/>
     <foo><b:bar/><foo/>
   </dest>
   With bar->ns still referencing the stored xmlNs struct.
 - if added to the tree a xmlReconciliateNs would attach bar->ns to
   dest->nsDef, avoiding redundant declarations.
So quite some less declarations.
 

Ok, things became crystal after looking at your scenario. Think I got my 
head up my ass today as it took me forever to realize what you were saying.
That should work fine. As I mentioned before worst case a call to 
xmlReconciliateNs after calling the adopt function could fix up the data 
if for some reason it didnt integrate well with other functionality.

Rob
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml