Hi, On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:16 +0200, GUY Fabrice wrote: > Hi, > > I have this schema : > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> > <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";> > <xsd:element name="ELEMENTS"> > <xsd:simpleType> > <xsd:union> > <xsd:simpleType> > <xsd:restriction base="xsd:int"> > <xsd:minInclusive value="10"/> > <xsd:maxInclusive value="20"/> > </xsd:restriction> > </xsd:simpleType> > <xsd:simpleType> > <xsd:restriction base="xsd:int"> > <xsd:minInclusive value="30"/> > <xsd:maxInclusive value="40"/> > </xsd:restriction> > </xsd:simpleType> > </xsd:union> > </xsd:simpleType> > </xsd:element> > </xsd:schema> > > and this simple xml file : > <ELEMENTS>5</ELEMENTS> > > This xml file validates using xmllint (with libxml 2.6.19) although 5 > does not fall in the interval [10,20] neither [30,40]. > > But maybe the 'union' type is not yet fully implemented ?
This was a bug: in some cases, the facet-violation was not channelled back to the main validation function. Fixed in CVS, xmlschemas.c rev 1.133. I added your case to the regression tests. We have currently no informative error-messages for union types. So you'll get only a "The character content is not valid." message. Thanks for the report! Kasimier _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
