On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:23:43AM -0400, Rob Richards wrote: > Ok, just changing my response now as I just noticed it was committed 2 > hours ago. > > Personally with an imminent release would have liked to wait until after > the release for the code to be added especially since a discussion was > held off. My little free time right now has been spent testing the > upcoming release against PHP seeing as PHP 5.1 is also in beta release, > so havent had much time to look at new functionality of this scale. Wont > setting the context structure prior to this release pretty much set it > in stone or end up causing BC breakage with the next release?
I am the one who suggested to Kasimier to push to CVs precisely to get testing, but labelling it as experimental. I think we can grow the structure fairly reasilly in the future. Are you afraid of PHP-5.2 compiled against a vertion of libxml2 post 2.6.20 and running with 2.6.20 and hence a limited context ? If this is the case we can arbitrarily put a function pointer in the lot and a couple more int and data pointers for good measure and feel safe about it. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
