On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 02:30:30PM -0400, Mike Maxwell wrote: > Daniel Veillard wrote: > > 2/ I don't think entity support for XSD makes much sense, you'd better > > always run with entities substitued > > (I'm not clear what the XSD has to do with this--both the entity defn > and the reference to the entity are inside the XML file. But maybe I > just don't understand...) > > > so use xmllint --noent --schema .... to run your checks. > >I'm not sure this really qualifies as a bug. Best is to run it that way, > > Yes, now that I see the description, I realize that's what I should have > been doing. (And the error msg goes away.) Thanks! > > (But doesn't the msg > Unimplemented block at > /instsoft/libxml/uploaded/libxml2-2.6.20/xmlschemas.c:23832 > indicate a bug? Or is this more on the order of an 'assert', a reminder > to the programmers that s.t. remains to be finished?)
Entities are not part of the data model of XSD, so should be substitued. That just indicate you hit that point and while it might be taken care in some case, there is way more urgent stuff to do for the Schemas developpers than this. > Ah, just to make myself look good <blush>:-)</blush>, the description of > the "nonet" option appears twice (in adjacent lines) in the man page for > xmllint, on both the CygWin and FreeBSD systems. Okay, found and fixed, thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
