Hi, On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 11:12 +0200, GUY Fabrice wrote: > Hi,
> ...so OK for the deal, I can try to do that, starting with element > declarations, then maybe IDC definitions. But I must confess that I > have absolutly no idea of the difficulty of this task. Great! I use the xmlSchemaBasicItem type as the internal most basic type for all the schema structs. It would probably be good if the accessor functions would take only this type, to be free to revamp the somehow oversized public structures in the future. Other ideas? Regards, Kasimier _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
