On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:32:41PM +0200, Stefan Kost wrote:
> > > Can anyone point me to an example as a proof of concept?
> >
> > xsltproc --dumpextensions
> $ xsltproc --dumpextensions | grep strings
> {http://exslt.org/strings}concat
> {http://exslt.org/strings}tokenize
> {http://exslt.org/strings}encode-uri
> {http://exslt.org/strings}padding
> {http://exslt.org/strings}split
> {http://exslt.org/strings}decode-uri
> {http://exslt.org/strings}align
>
> so it seems to be available. Thus I dropped the include with the custom
> implementation.
> >
> > > >> What makes you think so? From the log you posted:
> > > >> | Registering extension prefix str : http://exslt.org/Strings
> >
> > You could always spell the namespace correctly.
>
> That came from the inlcude. I named it
> xmlns:str="http://exstl.org/strings";
>
> unfortunately still no success here :(
there is a number of examples on how to use them in the regression tests
suite:
paphio:~/XSLT -> ls tests/exslt/strings/
CVS/ split.1.out tokenize.1.out tokenize.2.xml tokenize.3.xsl
Makefile split.1.xml tokenize.1.xml tokenize.2.xsl
Makefile.am split.1.xsl tokenize.1.xsl tokenize.3.out
Makefile.in tca.log tokenize.2.out tokenize.3.xml
paphio:~/XSLT ->
as they are part of the test suite they are garanteed to work.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
