Hi Oliver, > After reading it again, the first sentence is a mess. Should be > > "Check if both strings are equal or have the same content." > > IMO the "have the same content part" feels a bit redundant. Strings, > that are equal do have the same content... > But if the two pointers are equal, the strings are equal too for sure ;)
Stefan > >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 03:40:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> xmlStrEqual() has a pretty bad sentence as documentation: >>> >>> "Check if both string are equal of have same content Should be a bit more >>> readable and faster than xmlStrEqual()" >>> >>> There are a few errors in it: >>> - "string" should be "strings" >>> >> done >> >> >>> - the two senetnce should be seperated with a dot >>> >> done they are in separate lines in the source, though. >> >> >>> - xmlStrEqual() should be fester then xmlStrEqual()!? >>> >> already fixed, it was just not propagated to docs yet. >> >> thanks, will commit :-) >> >> Daniel >> >> -- >> Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ >> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml > _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
