Hi, On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 03:27 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:31:46PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > So I'm just repeating my question in case it went out of focus: > > Does anyone see problems wrt adding a public wrapper for > > xmlStaticCopyNode() which also takes a @parent argument? > > Fine in principle. In practice, it's one more entry point in the > API, will the people who need it find it ?
After having thought more about it, I don't feel comfortable to expose an equivalent of xmlStaticCopyNode() if I'm heading for a function like xmlDOMWrapCloneNode() in the long term, which, at least, _I_ would be able find ;-) So I withdraw my proposal to add a public equivalent of xmlStaticCopyNode(). Regards, Kasimier _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
