On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:00:40PM +0000, James Bursa wrote: > On Wednesday 11 January 2006 17:59, iSteve wrote: > > Daniel Veillard said (on IRC, though not on this mailing list) that he's > > waiting for feedback about how to fix this issue. > > > > I for myself have to say I'd remove it completely; I do not think it is > > reasonable to have the document altered by the parser in first place; > > I've found some more issues with it in the mailing list, too. > > (http://mail.gnome.org/archives/xml/2002-October/msg00047.html) > > > > Since DV didn't ask himself -- it is after all me who wants this bug > > fixed -- I have to ask: what do all of you think about it? Any > > suggestions how it should be resolved? > > We use the HTML parser in NetSurf, a browser > (http://netsurf.sourceforge.net/).
heh, good to know :-) > We're happy with the current behaviour of the parser (which isn't what you > describe in your original message in the latest version). I agree that the > parser mostly shouldn't alter the document, although the current behaviour of > inserting implied html, head, and body is useful. > > I'd prefer if the parsing was not affected by the Doctype, because it's mostly > meaningless on the web. point taken ! Thanks for the feedback ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
