On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:32:35AM -0500, Rob Richards wrote: > All that explains is what the three programs do and how to run them. > Just wanted to know if one way was better (or more accurate) than the other.
the 3 programs tests a bit less, but allow testing on more platforms, and do things like valgrind tests, etc ... > Reason I ask is I ran the tests both ways on linux then tried it on > Windows. Windows failed for all the ent11 and ns7 tests using runtests > (while the nmake tests were passing as it ended up ignoring the line > endings) so I was tracking down why. Seems grabbing those files > result\.. (and it is only those 2 sets of files) from CVS under windows > has windows line endings while the same files retrieved under linux has > unix linefeeds. Its not a CVS setting as the other result files are > retrieved correctly with unix line endings. cvs diff shows no difference > between the files, so wondering where the linefeeds are coming from. Well may depend on your CVS client. I would say checkout on a sane platform and just export the code to Windows from there. Also allows to make CVS diffs without end of line brokeness, and in general to trust the tools. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
