On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:18:09PM -0500, Rob Richards wrote: > A lot of the code can be elimintated using existing functionality, such > as what's the different between the xmlGetProp functions and just > xmlHasNsProp or xmlTreeNewPropRaw and xmlNewDocProp?
yes please :-) , I'm guilty too of copy/paste feel free to fix ! > The one question I have regards the function signatures. I'm assuming > that the ones with leading comments are the ones to be exposed The rule is that anything exported from an header in include/libxml must have a complete comment header, as it's used for the doc extraction. I also prefer to have *all* function even static ones commented that way. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
