Hi Rob, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Sorry I didn't catch this change earlier, but I think the 
> change made to 
> not add an attribute with a : in its name when no namespace 
> is found is 
> incorrect. The change I am referring to is rev 1.366 of tree.c:
>     /*
>     * If we get a QName and the prefix has no namespace-
>     * binding in scope, then this is an error.
>     * TODO: Previously this falled-back to non-ns handling.
>     *   Should we revert this?
>     */
>     return(NULL);
> 
> A colon is a legal character for an attribute name. Although 
> not where 
> this issue cropped up and why I didn't catch it before, take DOM for 
> example. For DOM level 1 where there is no namespace support, the 
> attribute should be added to the document with the colon in its name.
> 
> I think this should be reverted.

Yes, agreed.

The general problem with xmlSetProp() is that it tries to work for
both DOM levels, without actual control over it from the caller's side.
If I want to put in a Level 1 attribute, then I might get a Level 2
attribute back, since I happened to use a colon in my name and was
unlucky
that there was a ns-decl in scope with a prefix matching the left side
of
the colon :-)
Maybe we should document very explicitely that this function should
simply
not be used. If someone wants a pure Level 1 attribute-setting function
than we need yet to invent one.

Regards,

Kasimier
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Reply via email to