On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:48:59PM -0400, Enrico Silterra wrote: > Aleksey, > we are switching from using a dtd - to using a schema - > and are looking for the equivalent behavior - where, when
Sorry I don't think this is implemented. Basically it's PSVI add-on to the validated tree and that's a very sensible topic, there is no PSVI support in libxml2 at this point. > using a dtd, the default attributes were supplied. > I am trying to understand why - what seems to be the > correct behavior (in my opinion) -- maybe I don't understand the c14n > spec -- > does not happen, and if, using schemas, there is a way to > get it to happen. Because DTD are part of XML-1.0 you can rely on them. XSD are an add-on with an awful lot of dark corners, I would not rely on it too heavilly. C14N has no dependancy on XML Schemas as far as I can tell http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n#bibliography you can't expect XSD attribute or element defaulting when processing C14N . Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
