On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:25:18PM +0530, murali wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you all for your replay. Due to namespace dependency,I think behavior > is ok. It solved my query. > And one more thing I noticed is libxml treats this as error but not fatal > error (in terms of xml standard). I think it should be treated as fatal > error and java considers it as fatal error. > Let me know your take on this.
It think treating this as fatal is overblown. Fatal Errors were designed to avoid misinterpretation of XML data. in that case there is no risk of misinterpretation, just that the document may not fit well processing using namespaces, which from an XML perspective is optional... Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
