Sorry to the list, I forgot to CC. But my original reply was quoted, so nothing is lost =)
To add, I wrote my validator (or to be exact, rewrapped rnv) as, unfortunately, I found the RelaxNG validation in libxml2 lacking. The error reporting is, again unfortunately, completely fubar if the RelaxNG schema is more complex... (Just have a look at the bug tracker) Jatayu schrieb: > Hi Belgabor, > > Thanks for trying this with your validator. > > I agree it seems like a bug / inconsistency in libxml2. > > I would still be interested to hear comment about this > from other folks. > > Regards, > = jatayu > _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
