On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 06:59:33PM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Hi, > > Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:03AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > >> Since you seems to be interested in the performances of the hash > >> algorithm, I tried to drop the string comparisons on lookup when possible > >> I have an old patch for this which I'm enclosing, but I never applied it > >> since I had problems at the time (can't remember why/where, it's just > >> a FYI patch ;-) > > > > Of course I forgot the patch in the first mail ... > > Hmm, wait, this patch is against hash.c, which already contains it (more or > less). I was talking about the hash function in dict.c (see subject line).
humpf, I got confused, sorry :-) Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
