Hi, I have a question regarding the omission of the xml:base attribute when including a file located in the same directory as the includer. I've read, in an old newsgroup post, that this was done on purpose when the xml:base support was implemented (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/docbook/2003-03/msg00101.html)
Is there a workaround for this? In other words, is there a way I could force the parser to add the xml:base attribute for all inclusions, regardless of their directory? I'm hoping to implement an error-reporting and coverage tool for xml-embedded code, and using the xml:base attribute seems like the least invasive way to locate a code snippet. (I'm using libxml 2.6.22 by the way, but could consider an upgrade if essential. However, nothing in the release notes indicated that this behavior had changed) Of course, we can always move the files around so that includer files will always be in a directory of their own. But I'd prefer a more elegant solution if possible. Thanks, Catherine _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
