On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 07:02:55AM -0800, Rush Manbert wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2008, at 5:19 PM, Rush Manbert wrote: > >> HI, >> >> I just got libxml 2.7.2 and have built it on the Mac under OS X 10.5. >> >> The make generates quite a few warnings, so I am interested in the >> test results.
in general try "make check" >> I ram "make tests" and it generates lots of output. The last few lines >> are these: >> ## Module tests >> module error : failed to open .libs/testdso.so apparently shared lib support or problem with shared library names would be platform specific >> ## examples regression tests >> Unable to open test2.xml huh ... are you sure docs/examples/ is complete from the tarball checkout, seems there is a problem there. >> This looks ominous, but make doesn't report any errors. Is this the >> expected result when the tests pass? no, clearly >> After this, I tried running the four test programs mentioned in >> README.tests. The only one that is problematic is runtest, which >> reports this: >> Total 508 tests, 1 errors, 0 leaks >> >> In the course of running the tests it has spewed out thousands of >> lines that report errors of one sort or another. My question is how do >> I figure out what the one real error is that is being reported? no idea, I assume it's always the same error. > I'd like to add a supplemental question. If my goal is to run the full > make, then run all the tests and verify that they pass, should I just > use the check target? DSo I need to run any of the command line test > programs outside of make? "make ; make check" should mostly work, though I test only on Linux myself. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
