> 2009/7/27 Daniel Veillard :> No that's where node were allocated i.e. when
> parsing the tree > if then> you remove some of the tree pointers then
> valgrind will report where> this was allocated not where the bug occured.Yes,
> valgrind will point you to the spot where the memory was allocated.>
> 2009/7/27 Grzegorz Ja?kiewicz:> sDoc = xmlParseFile(filename);...> for(int
> j=0; j < sc->nodesetval->nodeNr; j++)> {> if(NULL !=
> sc->nodesetval->nodeTab)> {> if(NULL!=(sNode =
> sc->nodesetval->nodeTab[j]))> {> xmlDocSetRootElement(sDoc,
> sNode);I'm not sure what you're trying to do here, but I would assume you
> want to shorten the document for future xpath evaluation.I personally would
> not do it this way because sDoc is the only pointer you have to memory
> allocated at xmlParseFile(). Once you 'shorten' the document, you effectively
> loose track of all memory that's not part of sNode's subtree. Maybe you could
> try getting the document fragment starting at sNode and make that the root of
> a _new_ document.Piotrek
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
