On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 07:39:03PM +0300, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> On 2/10/2010 19:12, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 06:15:38PM +0300, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> >>Both calls have a header comment about their reentrance capability.
> >>Is it a comment bug?
> >>
> >>Does reentrant in this case mean that I can pass a string already
> >>encoded with xmlEncodeEntitiesReentrant
> >>to this call again?
> >   no it's related to xmlEncodeEntities() deprecated function which used
> >a global variable for doing the conversion and hence was not
> >thread-safe.
> >
> Also it's not clear how to deal with a case my string is already
> escaped, or partially escaped for example.
> Looks like these helpers will break it converting from "&" to
> "&"...

  Yes, in general escaping forces you to know where the string is
coming from and whether escaping was already done... that's no different
in libxml2 APIs than elsewhere. Sometimes you realy want &
for example if wou write (X)HTML examples in a tutorial about XML syntax.
The library has no way to guess...

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Reply via email to