On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 21:00 +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: > - the XML schemas datatype part driven by > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/
> . But I wonder if updating is actually right w.r.t. > XSD. Honnestly I don't know, One thing would be to try and see what > it gives on regression tests. > > They say "However, implementors are encouraged to support the blocks > defined in any future version of the Unicode Standard. " but that was > written a long time ago and could lead to some incompatibilities. It's repeated in the XSD 1.1 specification published this year. > Liam, maybe you have an informed point of view on the question, shall > we update to more recent version of Unicode for XSD datatype v1.0 ? Yes, I think so. If there are errors let's investigate them. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
