On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 07:11:35PM +0000, Alex Bligh wrote: > > BTW the xml is generated so that should be discarded from the > > patch, > > That's strange. It appears in git and has a history. > https://git.gnome.org/browse/libxml2/tree/doc/libxml2-api.xml > > How does one regenerate it (as the normal build process > didn't)?
Ah, well usually I do this only at release times, but it can be useful when developping a patch too, so have a look at doc/apibuild.py It is a large bit of rather ugly Python, but it scans the .h files, the .c files, and generate a formal API description of all exported entry points and structures: doc/libxml2-api.xml >From there a number of other things are generated such as the online docs, checks for the exported symbol files, python bindings ... doc/ is been exported as the website for the project, so what you see online reflects the documentation for what is foudn in git, and what you see on your hard drive (if you installed the developments bits) is what corresponds to your released version. Those are non-standard practices of libxml2 development and I reused them into libxslt and libvirt :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat veill...@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml