On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Daniel Veillard <veill...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Is there any theoretical or design reason not to apply this patch to > > tree.c? As I mentioned, working with HTML fragments to build we pages is > a > > pretty common task. Being able to traverse entity children on such a > > fragment would be useful. I suspect this was just an oversight. > > > > Comments? Concerns? > > Yup, just an oversight IMHO > Excellent! Thanks so much. -- ky...@kylev.com Some people have a way with words, while others... erm... thingy.
_______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
