2015-03-27 1:47 GMT-06:00 Daniel Veillard <veill...@redhat.com>: > Hum, I would say it's the wrong way. IT doesn't affect the library, but > we definitely don't want XML_PARSER_SUBST_ENTITIES by default. Using > it means you trust the document. It's better to add the flag only > when needed. Also I'm not sure it's the right 'way', I would expect > validation fixes to be done in the schemas code, not by tweaking > parser options,
You know the libxml codebase much, much better than I do. Could you suggest a better patch for bug #709171, or at least tell me which specific file needs to be modified? -Alex _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml