2015-03-27 1:47 GMT-06:00 Daniel Veillard <veill...@redhat.com>:
> Hum, I would say it's the wrong way. IT doesn't affect the library, but
> we definitely don't want XML_PARSER_SUBST_ENTITIES by default. Using
> it means you trust the document. It's better to add the flag only
> when needed. Also I'm not sure it's the right 'way', I would expect
> validation fixes to be done in the schemas code, not by tweaking
> parser options,

You know the libxml codebase much, much better than I do. Could you
suggest a better patch for bug #709171, or at least tell me which
specific file needs to be modified?

-Alex
_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

Reply via email to