On 11/07/19 20:00 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> I've run into a source of frustration based on an unset advice
> in the documentation that I hope to remove with this change.
> Or did I overlook something?  Thanks for pulling otherwise!
> (Indeed, there could be substantially bigger cut, like possibly
> retargeting xmlBufCreate as public, etc. but no wonders if there's
> not much will for that once the status quo lasted so long...)

Also submitted as a merge request for more persistent tracking
and possible discussion:

(As an aside, RelaxNG seems not to be in shape when any advanced
grammar constructs are present, i.e., not just a matter of performance
but rather the correctness of validation:

Jan (Poki)

Attachment: pgp9LlzhAzzYC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/

Reply via email to