Hi Marcel thanks for the qick responses. For the moment I'm only testing to connect TIMS-sites (it is IDVS using LINUX), so I used a workaround, which dit it. For the other solutions I would need more time and Kroners
Hope to see you Juergen > Hi Juergen, > > nice to meet you here! > > I just compiled mico and omniOrb and it is as Michele said: > mico is single threaded which leads to a deadlock when calling > a remote message from a callback. > > You have to choose: > > o mico -> avoid the above > > o orbix -> have some spare Kroner to buy it > > o tao -> is very huge but works fine > > o omniORB -> is small, high performing (would be my choice) > > o Finish the C plugin embedding into C++ > -> You may need to add a C thread pool into the C code first > -> Is very tiny and you don't need any CORBA anymore > -> Would be a nice contribution to xmlBlaster > > regards > > Marcel > > > > > Hi Juergen, > > the problem is that MICO is not a multithread orb. We tested what you > > suggested with omniorb and tao and both work. I think if you want this > > feature you need to switch to a multithread orb like tao omniorb or orbix. > > > > Regards > > Michele > > > > > > > > J�rgen Prinz wrote: > > > >> I encountered a problem using c++ when calling a subscribe to the > >> xmlBlaster out of the update-callback. The callback was invoked before > >> the "Main"-subscribe returned. Neither call to subscibe returned. > >> This can be demonstrated by modifiing SubscribeDemo.cpp too. > >> > >> When using java there are no problems dooing this. > >> > >> Best regards > >> > >> J. Prinz > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- > http://www.xmlBlaster.org > > > > --
