I agree. Has anyone heard the phrase, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"? Many
companies have spent plenty
of money in their current EDI inftrastructure. And guess what? These are the
"guts" of many integrated processing
systems today. I believe XML has its strengths and applications but don't rule
out good old EDI.
Brad Berendt
Sterling Commerce
District Consulting Mgr - E-Commerce Solutions Microsoft
Managed Services Division
Office: 614-791-5782 Fax: 614-793-7045
Scott Shulman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/01/2000 04:26:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brad Berendt/Dublin-ISG)
Subject: RE: Software - Objectivity
People, RELAX. Everyone thinks this XML thing is going to replace this thing
called EDI, Just because this is the newest buzz word. What happened to
CPFR, That was last year's buzz word. What happened to VMI, That was two
years ago buzz word. We are still several years out before this thing called
XML takes over the world.
Scott Shulman
Director of E-Commerce
K-Swiss inc
818-706-5203
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 12:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Software - Objectivity
>
> Having recently completed a 5 month evaluation process of XML - B2B
> Servers
> and vendors, I have some relevant experience in the process of selection
> to
> share. We did the following:
>
> * Evaluated vendors according to their industry participation and
> experience (Rosettanet in our case)
> * Met with this subset of vendors
> * Participated in 3 vendors' proof-of-concepts
> * Scored each vendor according to a formal weighted scorecard
> * Considered development plans and schedules
> * Completed a subjective evaluation
>
> The last item, "subjective evaluation" is very important and I would like
> to
> expand on this. In the fast evolving software industry, products can
> change
> on a daily basis. During our recent evaluations we continually needed to
> see the "latest" version of a vendor's product. Our "objective" scorecard
> was likely obsolete even before it was finished. This reality led me to
> recognize that the "relationship" with a vendor was even more relevant to
> our needs than the "daily" feature list.
>
> The ability to cooperate in product development, future feature
> development,
> and priorities are more important to our company's B2B e-commerce success
> than a particular list of features in any given day. A relationship, and
> channel of communications with a vendor's decision makers is vital. The
> B2B
> / XML vendor relationship should not be that of buyer/seller, but that of
> "partner". The B2B / XML solution vendor is a virtual extension of our
> internal IT department. The vendor who recognizes this and delivers based
> upon this relationship is worth serious consideration.
>
> 0============================0
> | Kevin Benedict
> | B2B E-Commerce Manager
> | micronpc.com
> | 208-893-1738
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | "The Process is the Product"
>
> 0============================0
>
>
>
>
> ------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
> Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
>
> Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Leave the subject and body of the message blank
>
> Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
> http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
>
>
------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank
Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank
Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
