Hi Brad,
Glad you got it solved. Since you have solved it I am posting this message on the
mail list so no one else will continue to help you with it. That will give closure to
it on the mail list.
Glad to help,
Steve
At 05:43 PM 7/13/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi Steve:
>
>I really appreciate you taking the time to look at my problem and give a
>hand. Alas, I have finally gotten the desired result! I'm sorry my
>explanation was unclear, but your example is a correct assessment of what I
>was talking about. Thanks again!
>
>Brad
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Steve Bollinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 12:52 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Please Help !! XML/EDI LOOPS
>
>
>Hi Brad,
>
>I am fairly certain that I did not follow all you said. Perhaps an XML
>sample would help the communication of the problem. Is this sometimes like
>what you want?
>
><POLines>
> <SAC value="SAC1">
> <PO1>....</PO1> (PO1s for SAC1)
> <PO1>....</PO1>
> </SAC>
> <SAC value="SAC2">
> <PO1>....</PO1> (PO1s for SAC2)
> <PO1>....</PO1>
> </SAC>
> <SAC value="SAC3">
> <PO1>....</PO1> (PO1s for SAC3)
> <PO1>....</PO1>
> </SAC>
></POLines>
>
>Can you explain the problem a little more fully perhaps in relation to a
>diagram or some visual representation?
>
>I think I lost your explanation at: "when there is a new occurrence of the
>SAC, this should stop the population of the remaining PO1's in the first
>SAC." What does "stop the population" mean exactly?
>
>Steve
>
>
>At 02:43 PM 7/12/00 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Hi:
>>
>>I am an EDI analyst and have been working on an EDI2XML conversion for one
>>of our customers and have run into an issue that I cannot resolve. I am
>>hoping that someone has had similar experience and will share their
>solution
>>with me. I am converting an EDI 855 to and XML doc for our customer and
>>cannot resolve the following looping structure issue. We are passing a
>value
>>in the SAC segment that is to contain all PO1 segments, that immediately
>>follow, as child nodes of the SAC in the XML output. However, when there is
>>a new occurrence of the SAC, this should stop the population of the
>>remaining PO1's in the first SAC. Only the PO1s that directly follow the
>>last SAC should be contained in the nearest upper level SAC. Of course the
>>element nodes have different names than the EDI, but this is the structure
>>that I am looking for. I am able to write individual and repeating nodes
>for
>>the SAC (parent), but ALL PO1s included in the entire 855 are populating
>the
>>XML output at all levels of the SAC: they are not looping at the proper
>>level. If anyone has a suggestion, I would greatly appreciate it.
>>
>>Thank You,
>>
>>Brad Williams
>>Advanced Marketing Services
>>EDI Coordinator
>>ph(858)457-2500x2355
>>fax(858)812-6480
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
Steve Bollinger 408-853-8478
Cisco Systems GPS-IT XML/EDI Inventory Initiative
------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank
Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To receive only one message per day (digest format)
send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
(leave the subject line blank)
digest xmledi-group your-email-address
To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
