I don't follow this? Do you mean 'validate' not 'parse', meaning that a
non-MS XML parser could read the document, but since there's no DTD and
that the Schema specified in the namespaces are beyond 'XML 1.0
Validation' that the "proper" business logic would not be extracted?
Using my highest level language (other than pseudo-code :), it seems to
parse out ok:
http://ix.granularity.net/test/test.biztalkexample.cfm
h
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Williams, Brad wrote:
> Timothy,
>
> As I stated in my email, "this is a well-formed XML file". That is to say,
> that it is syntactically correct. For every start tag, there is an end tag,
> etc. However, this has nothing to do with actually parsing the file. That is
> a different matter entirely. IE, is, after all a MS product, and the default
> parser in XML Spy 3.5 is MSXML. If you have an XML parser, other than MS's
> XML parser, try to run it and you will see that the file will not parse(you
> can change the default parser in XML Spy 3.5 under settings, after you
> install the parser, if you don't want to run command line). This discussion
> began with the pitfalls/dangers of application specific vs. industry
> "standards". A BizTalk XML file is MS application specific.
>
> Brad
------ XML/edi Group Discussion List ------
Homepage = http://www.XMLedi-Group.org
Unsubscribe = send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank
Questions/requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To receive only one message per day (digest format)
send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
(leave the subject line blank)
digest xmledi-group your-email-address
To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm
