Does Jim Cunningham have an email address? I don't get the individual
          addresses listed, just mail lists that are not broken down.

          I have a question for him that I don't want to bore the whole group
          with....

                    Chris Kelly
                    Computer Systems Programmer/Analyst Sr.
                    United States Postal Service
                    San Mateo, Ca, 94497-9211

                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]




______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Out of Office AutoReply: My Perspective
Author:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] at INTERNET
Date:    2/1/2002 10:18 PM


In a message dated 2/1/02 2:37:26 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> Subj:  Out of Office AutoReply: My Perspective
>  Date:    2/1/02 2:37:26 PM Eastern Standard Time
>  From:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] (LUBASH, MIKE)
>  To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  I am out of the office from 28 January - 3 February 2002.     If you
> require immediate assistance, please forward your inquiry to Eric Okin at
703.
> 607.2032
>
>

This "thing"? AGAIN?

Thanks for auto-sharing what auto-seems an auto-grandiose self importance
image w/little'old me.  NOT!

With this utilization, your obviously robust and full featured auto-mailer
automaton seems obviously deterministic and herewith, under examined,
perhaps.  Loooong ago, emailers coined the term for this, "trashing their
mailbox", which by the way, was then triggering automated boocoo emails to an
offender by "the establishment" of that newsgroup, but has evolved quite
naturally to emailing boocoo posts to just a boocoo of individuals (divide
and conquer? what? "fears" of what's expected? by just ignoring them? is our
mission to go (end up really) boldly where we don't belong?)

How long (many times) "must we suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous
fortune" (Bard)? As long as newbies ascend to the level from whence we came
(via different paths, perhaps?)?

Newbies w/email service that fail to do an even reasonable amount of research
of it's impact do make such an impression on those of us who "went before".

Unfortunately.

We're way beyond off-topic now!

I'm am herewith appolo-gizing! (for this! me! now!) as sincerely as may pass
muster with some, really, sorta, for sure.

Regards (not the usual kind this time),

JIM CUNNNINGHAM

P.S.

Anybody catch the .gov above?

wernt the .govs "here" "first", waaaay long ago (first, really; their cash;
but they got it from us tho)?

As taxpayers, we have a question: For "this" we pay MONEY?

P.P.S.

I'm over it.  Really.  For now (till the next one, at least).  What's in
store for us?  Automatons will beat us with auto-batons?

Perhaps.

It could happen.  Hasn't it ?/.


------   XML/edi Group Discussion List   ------
Homepage =  http://www.XMLedi-Group.org

Unsubscribe =  send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank

Questions/requests:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To receive only one message per day (digest format)
send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
(leave the subject line blank)

digest xmledi-group your-email-address

To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm

------   XML/edi Group Discussion List   ------
Homepage =  http://www.XMLedi-Group.org

Unsubscribe =  send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leave the subject and body of the message blank

Questions/requests:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To receive only one message per day (digest format)
send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
(leave the subject line blank)

digest xmledi-group your-email-address

To join the XML/edi Group complete the form located at:
http://www.xmledi-group.org/xmledigroup/mail1.htm


Reply via email to