Mark Fletcher wrote: > > Do you have a beta testing program for 3.2? If so, I'd love to be > involved.
No, we don't have a public beta-testing program for minor releases. > Is your current pricing valid for 3.2 as well? Yes. Unlike one of our competitors, we don't have a special ``DITA Edition''. DITA support is contained in a configuration add-on similar to other configuration add-ons. > Regarding your final point: any estimated time on when you might support > the missing DITA features? (Just a ballpark. End of this year? Early > next year?) Difficult to say, especially for the most important missing feature[*]: lack of DITA processing. This, because we haven't really analyzed the OpenToolkit (http://dita-ot.sourceforge.net/) yet. We *really* do not intend to rewrite the XSLT style sheets, but we would like to replace the ant tasks/Java[tm] glue by our own, ``native'', process commands. --- [*] We believe that one could live with non-transcluded conrefs, at least during the next few months.
