Peter.Schulte at gad.de wrote: > > I have made some further investigations and I have found 2 reasons for > my problem: > > Reason 1: > In order to move sections from "right to left" I use the command > decrSectionLevel within my macro command. DecrSectionLevel is a command > written in Java provided in the product, which obviously does not use > the API "isEditable". You can simply reproduce the problem if you call > this command on a section within a referenced part of a document. The > command seems to do its job but it cannot be because the changes are in > the referenced part. Furthermore the action cannot be undone.
This is obviously a bug in the incrSectionLevel/decrSectionLevel commands. It will be fixed in next release. > Reason 2: > In order to move chapters or sections up and down I use an expanded > version of docb.moveItemUp/docb.moveItemDown. If you have a chapter as a > referenced part of a document and if you mark this part (that means the > whole chapter) then the following happens: > > - the chapter is cut > - the content (not the reference) of the chapter is pasted before/after > > The problem is that I do not know in my command if the marked element is > a reference or not. If you mark a part of a part, the cut-command does > not work. But if you mark the whole part, the cut-command works and puts > the content (not the reference) into the clipboard. This is not a bug. What you described works as expected: * The chapter you want to cut is read-only, but not its book parent. Therefore cutting the chapter is indeed possible. * Command "cut", just like the plain "copy" command, and unlike command "copyAsReference", is not ``reference-enabled''. Therefore what is being copied to the clipboard is plain XML nodes (and not a ``reference''). > Fortunately you can see that the grey background disappeared (that means > the referenced element is no longer referenced) and that this command > can be undone. Do not hesitate to suggest the tool you need to solve your problem (a way to test in a macro if a node is editable?). We'll try to implement it in next release.
