I think XXE is wrongly not supporting an un-scoped conref in this case. The conref in question was in a map/topicref element. I originally tried using a scoped href (file.ditamap#map_id/topicref_id), which XXE successfully transcluded; but the toolkit threw an error, expecting a non-scoped id (file.ditamap#topicref_id). So I think this is an XXE bug.
-----Original Message----- From: Hussein Shafie [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:11 AM To: Mark Fletcher Cc: xmleditor-support at xmlmind.com Subject: Re: [XXE] dita_map.css shows @href of source topicref even when a @conref is specified Mark Fletcher wrote: > > On a related topic, it looks like conrefs to map elements should not > be scoped. We had an earlier discussion about this regarding a > topicgroup, but I think it applies to all map elements. If my topicref > @conref looks like this: > > bar.ditamap#x/y > > the toolkit gives this error: > > [xslt] [DOTX010E][ERROR]: Unable to find target for > conref="bar.ditamap#x/y". Check the target element is available, and > that it is a 'xxxx' element. Check to make sure the target of conref > is correct. > > If I change my @conref to: > > bar.ditamap#y > > the process runs without a problem. However, XXE complains that it > can't transclude the @conref in this form. It is important to be very precise about what you really want to transclude: * If file "MyFile.dita" contains a *single* topic having "MyTopic" as its @id, this topic can be referred to as: [a] MyFile.dita [b] *OR* MyFile.dita#MyTopic --> XXE fully supports both paths. --> As of v3.4, the conref facility of XXE will use [a] rather than [b] because the DITA OT seems to prefer [a]. (Previously v3.3 always used [b].) * If file "MyFile.dita" contains a single topic having "MyTopic" as its @id, and if this topic contains a paragraph p having "MyParagraph" as its @id, the *only* way to refer to this paragraph is: MyFile.dita#MyTopic/MyParagraph "MyFile.dita#MyTopic" specifies the topic. "MyFile.dita#MyTopic/MyParagraph" specifies the p. You *cannot* use one for the other. If you attempt to do so, you'll get invalidity errors in XXE and of course, the p will not be transcluded. If XXE does not behave exactly as described above, then you may have found a bug. * In principle, if you use XXE *v3.4* conref facility, you should have no problem with the DITA OT. However, XXE *v3.3* used to create perfectly kosher documents which the DITA OT didn't like (due to bugs or limitations of the DITA OT, IMHO).
