Andreas Kemkes wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm just a bit confused here:
>
> This works:
> graphic:before {
> display: block;
> content: paragraph(content(image(attr(src), -400,
> -100, smooth), xpath("./alt")));
> }
>
> and this works - the text is red:
>
> graphic:before {
> display: block;
> content: paragraph(content(image(attr(src), -400,
> -100, smooth), xpath("./alt")));
> }
> graphic {
> color: red;
> }
>
> but this doesn't - no alt text:
> graphic {
> display: block;
> content: paragraph(content(image(attr(src), -400,
> -100, smooth), xpath("./alt")));
> }
I've tested the last rule with this sample:
---
http://www.pixware.fr/_download/Andreas/test.zip
1931bytes, Fri Apr 28 10:45:14 AM CEST 2006
---
And it works fine with v3.2.
> Also, can the two rules tag:first-of-type:before
> {...content:...} and tag:before {...content:...}
> co-exist?
Yes.
Excerpts of the DocBook CSS style sheets:
---
paramdef:before {
content: ", ";
color: gray;
}
paramdef:first-of-type:before {
content: " (";
}
paramdef:last-of-type:after {
content: ")";
color: gray;
}
---
> It appears that the first <tag> is only
> matched by the first selector, whereas all other
> <tag>s are matched by the latter. Is this expected
> behavior?
This is not a precise description of the expected behavior, but the
answer is yes.
