stephen.deal at kodak.com wrote: > We had used another tool (XMLSpy) to validate the gpp.xsd schema.
The W3C XML schema spec is so complex that validating a schema with just a single tool is not recommended. > However I ran the xsdvalid command on both the gpp.xsd and gpp.xml files to > see if xsdvalid identified any anomalies. > > I found it strange that even though the schema was valid the tool was > silent. > Even when I used -v it only reported: Loading schema 'file:gpp.xsd' > (1482ms) > No statement about the schema being valid. > I guess no news is good news... Congratulations, xsdvalid, and therefore XMLmind XML Editor, like your W3C XML schema. In fact, my recommendation was not very smart: XMLmind XML Editor would have reported W3C XML schema errors if some problems were found in your gpp.xsd.
